I reviewed Trevor Cole's second novel in yesterday's Toronto Star, and somehow managed to fuck up the title throughout the entire thing.
I won't even try to make an excuse for it.
The rest of the review turned out ok, though my yearning for more consistently competent Canadian writing sounds a wee bit hollow now, doesn't it?
Read it here, if you like.
[UPDATE: link fixed, I hope.]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A very subtle and funny writer - one I've become obsessed with over the past year - in a decidedly Muriel Spark mood. Imagine The Pr...
-
August over at Vestige.org has posted a long and very complimentary review/essay about my novel that morphs into a defense of the boring ol...
-
Mark Steyn is a dangerous idiot with a suspiciously homophobic streak for a bearded, show tunes-loving man who is drawn to big, strong, auth...
-
Penniless, woefully obscure Douglas Coupland went on a tear last week in the New York Times ’ subscriber-only online thing: "Can/Lit is...
3 comments:
I was wondering about that. Found it strange that he'd take Houellebecq's title. Anyway, it was a good review, so don't sweat it too much. (And where the frig was YOUR editor?)
btw, you also fucked up the TorStar link.
Rough day.
Post a Comment