The penalty was questionable at best, so where was the Pacino-esque scenery-chewing?
Of course, less than a minute later Mats Sundin netted his 500th career goal. Unassisted. From about thirty feet out. And it was the game winner. In overtime. Short handed.
I made a joke afterwards that Tucker took the penalty well because he knew the fix was in – he heard the swelling strings, and could see that his team was about to pull off one of those ultra-cornball moments of melodrama, where, the odds stacked against them, the true-hearted Buds pull off a miracle with the help of grit, determination, and – yes – just a little luck.
Ha ha, right?
Then I read this, in today's Toronto Star (scroll down):
[Emphasis mine.]
TUCKER PSYCHIC? Darcy Tucker had an odd sense of peace when he was sent off the ice for hooking with just eight seconds remaining in Saturday's game, even though the game was tied 4-4 and appeared headed for overtime.
"I had a funny feeling when I was in the box that something good was going to happen. I don't know, maybe you get calmer as you get older, but I was pretty calm in there. I just had this feeling that something good was about to happen," he said.
That something good was Mats Sundin scoring the winning goal, shorthanded in OT.
Cue the dying child: "Score me a – kaff, kaff – overtime winner tonight, please, Mr Sundin..."
3 comments:
You forgot to mention that Mats' game winner also completed a hat trick.
And yet... no hats.
Does it count if it comes in OT?
I think there was a smattering of hats.
(And btw, a friend who works at the ACC told me that such hats are scooped up and thrown in the garbage.)
Post a Comment