I'm out of it at the moment, so please go read Zach Wells on the funding structure that encourages what he calls the "hyperthyroidal" publishing of Canadian poetry.
The obvious counter-argument is that, if anyone with a working Return key and a nature encyclopedia (two essential tools in the creation of poetry, as far as I can tell) can get published, then at least there is little chance of a genuinely talented poet going completely unbound.
The counter-argument to that is that who would even notice a talented poet within such a river of crap?
The counter-argument to that is that talent will out.
The counter-argument to that is... will it?
To which I answer, "Who cares? We're talking about poetry here, for god's sake."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A very subtle and funny writer - one I've become obsessed with over the past year - in a decidedly Muriel Spark mood. Imagine The Pr...
-
August over at Vestige.org has posted a long and very complimentary review/essay about my novel that morphs into a defense of the boring ol...
-
Mark Steyn is a dangerous idiot with a suspiciously homophobic streak for a bearded, show tunes-loving man who is drawn to big, strong, auth...
-
Penniless, woefully obscure Douglas Coupland went on a tear last week in the New York Times ’ subscriber-only online thing: "Can/Lit is...
No comments:
Post a Comment